Introduction

Featured

Tags

,

Hi there,

Welcome to my blog, and thank you for visiting :-) . I’m not sure how this will go as while I enjoy keeping personal records I’ve never done it in such a public way. I’ve created this blog with the aim of sharing and exploring adventures, experiences and passions close to my heart. I’m hoping it will give any readers something they can take away for themselves whether it be inspiration, ideas, awareness, new perspective, or simply just enjoyment from reading the posts.

Firstly, my name is Samantha. At the time of creating this blog I’m 24 years old and living Auckland, New Zealand. I was born and raised here, and I know New Zealand will always be home no matter where I may find myself. Since I can remember I have enjoyed the company of critters great and small. I have a Bachelor’s degree in Applied Science (Wildlife Management and Animal Welfare), and I have always strived to work in some animal field or other from shelters to zoos to rehabilitation centres to veterinary hospitals.

When it comes to ‘To Do’ lists of experiences, I have two or three. There is the bucket list of things to do in my lifetime – things like visit Antarctica, go on a hot air balloon ride in Europe, see a soccer match in an English stadium – and then there is the list of things I want to achieve sooner rather than later. The latter is a list that came into fruition not too long ago and focuses mainly on exploring the things I am most passionate about – wildlife and their conservation and welfare.

Since I was little, non-human animals have been my fascination and main interest. I grew up in a house backing onto a reserve in the suburbs, and we’d always be out feeding the ducks and other birds. One thing I learnt more and more as I grew up is that animals cannot speak for themselves. Like human babies, they are dependent upon others to stand up for their welfare when it is in question. Animals have all levels of intelligence and a lot of the time I think it is forgotten how sentient they really are. We all have complex nervous systems, different methods of reproduction, brains of various sizes and function, and unique designs that give us the ability to fit into certain ecosystems. Different species work into different niches and through all these connections thus life on earth progresses. We are important to each other in some way.

As species have niches in different ecosystems, another thing I have learnt ‘growing up’ is that as individuals we are encouraged to find our own personal niche too. I think this can be a struggle in different ways for different people – there is so much to be passionate about, but sometimes people are unable to follow their passions, or they spend their life without one. I find myself drawn to people who care about what happens to the world and who strive to personally contribute something positive. I talk about it often with a friend of mine who views the earth as doomed – a ticking time bomb. She gets exasperated because she sees there is just so much to do; human rights, individual and species health, ecosystem wellbeing, the environment in general – these are examples of things I care about too, and it is easy to feel overwhelmed by it all. But I’ve decided that the best thing to do is stick with the things you feel most strongly about. There is so much I want to do, but sometimes you just have to take it one step at a time, and prioritise and plan where need be. With our individuality and uniqueness we thus have individual and unique passions, and I really do feel that if each person contributed something to an issue they felt strongly about, the world would be better off.

So I suppose that is why I have set up this blog; to be able to recount and set up journeys of contributing to and exploring things that matter to me. I’m grateful to anyone who takes the time to read it, and hope it encourages others to share and think about their own journeys and adventures. You will find a lot of wolf-related information and in-between bits and pieces in the more recent posts: watch this space; as the Thailand elephant sanctuary work approaches (mid-2013) I will be updating the blog as I go.

Sam.

Join me on Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/Blameitonmywildheartblog and Twitter – https://twitter.com/wildatheartblog


America – Wolves: 2010

Donations

Featured

Tags

, , , ,

The next journey planned is Thailand! I will be spending five weeks volunteering at the Wildlife Friends Foundation Thailand Elephant Refuge & Education Centre in Phetchaburi from 19th May 2013 through the world-wide volunteer placement organisation Globalteer. A letter of confirmation has been attached here.

The sanctuary requires a donation depending on number of weeks of involvement to cover accomodation, food costs and goes directly towards upholding the welfare of the elephants, the mahouts and their families living on site. It is a wonderful way to support a worthy cause. More information will be contained in my upcoming blogs. Please go to http://www.globalteer.org/about.aspx for official information on Globalteer as a charity.

If you would like to help by donating to this trip you can do so by visiting my Givealittle page at https://www.givealittle.co.nz/cause/blameitonmywildheart. Please, please, please include your name as a reference so I can thank you!

Thank you to all those who support me by visiting and reading this blog.

Sam.

America – Wolves: My Final Farewell

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

I spent just under three months working as a voluntary intern at the White Wolf Sanctuary in the USA’s state of Oregon. The parts of Oregon I saw were absolutely stunning, and not only did I get incredibly attached to the wolves, I also felt right at home with the wonderful people. It is one of those places I know I will always be able to return to, and be treated as family or a long lost friend.

During those several months I spent my time forming bonds with the wolves that positively benefited from direct human contact, learning about the wolf’s local and global conservation plights, and educating visitors who came from all over the world about this magnificent being: the wolf. Nothing can teach you more about a species’ behaviour than first-hand experience, and the more experiences  I had with the wolves the more I was able to relate their physical behaviour with theories I had read about in books, information I had studied, and was even able to tie many aspects in to the behaviour of the domestic companion dog of today. I currently have one of my most enjoyable jobs working at a wonderfully passionate petfood company that focuses on 100% natural, meaty diets for our domestic carnivores. I have not been with the company long, but I know this work with the wolves has given me a great insight into true natural carnivore nutrition. It was fantastic to see the wolves with a whole deer or elk carcass – they would rip straight into the belly, utilising those nutritious organs that are so underrated in a lot of commercial pet foods today. Seeing the utterly raw, natural vitality of the White Wolf Sanctuary wolves, I know I would want to encourage a similar effect with any animals in my care.

While I was at the Sanctuary, I felt as though I couldn’t imagine my life without the wolves. I spent my days watching the wolves zoom around their habitats, listened to them howl and sit with those that grew to trust me and seek my company. I still feel those bonds I formed with Tehalin, Sakarri and the others and am confident they will not be broken. Lois (WWS founder and director) always said once they have met and accepted you, you can turn up years later and still have them recognise you – the wolves don’t forget. I hope this is true. The most special moments for me were those quiet times when Tehalin and I would just sit together. He would reach his paw out to me, might look into my eyes and try to lick my face. Those small gestures of trust and affection meant so much, and still do. I struggle thinking about how long it has been since I saw them last. There are times I feel so spontaneously compelled to buy an online air ticket and head straight back – but then other things slip back into my mind; things like my employment, the studio flat I rent and the little kittens I have under my care that also trust and seek my company. It goes back to that point of mine, how we can often feel so far away from where we think we belong. I know I will get back, but when? It will not be soon enough.

Sadly, since I was there three years ago, Nepenthe, Ventana, Odot and – the most difficult for me to accept – Asabe have passed on. Understandably they were the oldest of the group, but when I learnt of their passing I felt heartbroken. Asabe especially; he was one of the beautiful gentle giants I grew so close with, and it is hard to realise he won’t be there when I go back. Life goes in cycles, I understand this, but knowing this doesn’t make the intense desire to see loved ones again diminish at all.

My last few days at the Sanctuary were, of course, so tough. I wanted to communicate to them that I would be back, but how do you do that with a group of animals? Of course I shed tears on my last day! Even kids movies get me crying, let alone knowing I’m walking away from these beautiful creatures and all the friends I’d made for who knows how long. I tried to hold those last moments with each wolf in my heart forever, and I’m glad I can still picture and feel it like it was yesterday. Saying goodbye to Lois was awful – I don’t think either of us were very good at goodbyes so we tried to keep it as short and casual as possible. I still email her to let her know I think of everyone at the Sanctuary every day. I’d love to see it in the winter, when the wolves get to bound through thick snow – they’d be in their prime then. Many things would have changed by the next time I go back, but any good change would add to the excitement of it all.

The moment eventually came where I had to take the Ocean Haven’s little truck and head back down the mountain for the last time. I waited as long as I could, but finally I couldn’t draw it out and more and just had to go. After saying goodbye to Lois, I gathered my things and pulled myself into the truck. I still remember the wolves’ eyes on me. I know the tears were running thick and fast, then!

I got to hear the wolves howl a few times. I remember the first day of arriving at the Sanctuary, Lois picked me up at the bottom of the mountain and drove me up herself with one of the other volunteers. As we came through the gorgeously thick forest and up to the Sanctuary fences, the wolves howled as if signalling that Lois was home. They howled on many occasions I was there, always during the bright day when their activity levels were high. Occasionally it would be when a tour group had just sat down for Lois’ educational presentation – that, I know, was an experience for them.

NIkeAs I drove out of the Sanctuary that evening, I remember Nike running along side the truck. I felt so guilty; I had wanted them to know I was sorry and would miss them every single day until I returned. I wanted them to know I was going, but I would be back. I thought I would just leave, and it would be like every other ending work day. But then Nike stopped in her tracks, lifted her head and howled, a long, sombre song. Slowly, the others began to join her. I had my windows down to wave and tell them goodbye as I left, and the melancholy echo filled the truck. It followed me down the mountain, even long after I was out of sight. Never will I forget that moment, or that powerful, lingering farewell.

With Tehalin

With Tehalin

Sam.

 

www.whitewolfsanctuary.com

The Wolf, the Woman, the Wilderness part II – and cats!

Tags

, , , , , ,

e Wilderness coverThe Wolf, the Woman, the Wilderness
A True Story of Returning Home

The Wolf, the Woman, the Wilderness is a story I have partially written about in a previous post. It follows the journey of Teresa tsimmu Martino, the author, and a little wolf pup she adopts as they each learn about what it means to be free and wild. Teresa realises the little wolf, Mckenzie, cannot stay in confinement forever and it is her duty to release her companion back ‘into the wild’.

One of Teresa’s major obstacles is finding a suitable place to release Mckenzie. Somewhere with enough wolves that Mckenzie will have a good chance of finding a pack, but not with such a high population density that there is too much competition for resources. If Teresa releases the little wolf too far north she will be in an area where wolves are even more persecuted and climate is harsher. In a national park there is the danger of Mckenzie being spotted and causing a stir with park authorities (sighting a new wolf in a territory is huge news!). In harder-to-access wilderness there is a higher chance of her being hunted.

She first releases Kip, the little black fox she had also adopted from Mckenzie’s sanctuary. It is easier to find an area for him – foxes do not even compare to the wolf when it comes to human rivalry. They mostly live out their lives unnoticed, and it makes Teresa’s decision on a release site much easier. When the day comes for his release, she sits down to have lunch with her wolf and hybrid, and opens Kip’s box thinking he will stay with them a while. Instead, he turns tail and scurries off to the trees with a last “sympathetic look”. Teresa feels not betrayed, or offended, but sadly surprised. She understands he has made his choice, and waits around until the evening in case he pops back. She does not see him again, though, and takes the wolves back to their home, pondering freedom.

“Kip’s freedom reminds me that we must find out way back to the centre of the world to stand on the peak, arms raised, palms open, and cry into the circling wind. We want our spirits back… Do I go live in the wilderness or do I create community wildness and form my own pack? Are we any different in emotion and thought from the people who lived before us? Have we just traded dreams?

Kip was sympathetic because my choice is hard.”

Teresa takes Mckenzie hunting often, to prepare her for release. She needs to know Mckenzie can hunt and kill on her own before letting her go. A howl will usually bring Mckenzie back from however far ahead she may be, but Teresa notices she becomes less and less inclined to head back to the car for the journey to the cabin. Teresa knows the release will be hard, but is more worried about Mckenzie deciding to stay in the wild before she is truly ready. She knows, however, that the wolf will make her own choice.

I feel a huge sadness as I come to the end of the book, nearer and nearer to Mckenzie’s release. I feel like sometimes the bonds we make with another soul are so strong that they just shouldn’t ever be broken. Teresa feels this way for Mckenzie – the wolf is her daughter, and her life will not be the same without her. Teresa’s own mother told her that your aim as a parent is to teach your children to live without you; you are successful when they do not need you anymore. So she pushes her emotional mindset to the side and instead looks to the good of this creature, this wild thing that every day becomes more and more frustrated in confinement.

Sometimes you could see the wolves at the White Wolf Sanctuary frustrated at their confinement. The centre is so big, though, and although it is split into different-sized ‘habitats’, there is plenty of space to run, jump, even swim. But too long in one habitat and the wolves would be ready to move on. In the wild they will roam miles in a day. They make their territories, come back to build dens, but there is that freedom of travel and the hunt. But looking at how many wolves are persecuted and slaughtered in their own wilderness, there is no feasible space for a group of Arctic wolves out there safely. Teresa certainly would not have released Mckenzie if she had not found a suitable area.

 

The moment when Teresa finally decides to release Mckenzie was so difficult to read! They go hiking together, in the spot Teresa has chosen, but she heads back down the mountain to her car after a while. She is afraid she has left Mckenzie to die, that the young wolf isn’t ready, but she drives home knowing she must give the wolf a chance. I won’t go into the end of the book, it is filled with tension, and even the happy parts of fulfilment are bittersweet to me; I can’t get over these emotional bonds we create with one another! Teresa will always miss and think of Mckenzie, who will have a shorter lifespan out in the wilderness – but she will be living her wild life – but as long as she has some sign that the young wolf can survive on her own, she will be able to accept her decision.

I’m going to switch to a complete different situation here, but lately I have been thinking about little Greywind’s rehoming. Just before the weekend I had been contacting by a gentleman asking to meet Greywind – he and his wife had previously owned a Lonely Miaow kitten that had tragically gone missing a few months ago, and they were ready to adopt another. To be honest this was the perfect situation for Grey; a couple that had patience for a shy little ex-stray cat. But those first few days play on my mind; how absolutely petrified she will be while she gets used to a new home and new family. It makes me almost feel as though I am breaking her trust; it took so much care and careful interaction to allow her to understand she is safe with me, and now she just adores me – there is no other way to put it. I feel like a bad foster mum by putting her in a situation where she is going to be afraid and unable to understand what is going on. But, I just have to think of the greater good for her; people absolutely ready to welcome her into their home with care, patience and understand is just what she needs.

On the weekend the couple came to meet Grey (and the other kittens). She was terrified, and hid on her crate in the bathroom. They were amazingly patient, hung out with her one-by-one quietly, and told me they had fallen in love with her photos. I was chuffed knowing I’m not the only one who thinks she’s a stunning animal! The possible adopters were fantastic; asked all about her personality, assured me they had been through a similar situation with their last Lonely Miaow cat (who was also extremely shy around strangers), and even asked me which of the other kittens Grey got along with the most as they were thinking about adopting a second for company.

As their visit progressed, I tried to get myself more and more into the mindset that Grey had found her forever home. I knew it was perfect. I couldn’t imagine anyone else being so patient and accepting of her. Dot, Caspian and Indi were over-playful though, and were extremely entertaining – in the end, it was Dot and Caspian that ended up heading off to their new home! Grey was just too shy, and the couple were satisfied she wouldn’t be out of a home if they didn’t take her. She’ll always have a home with me, if nobody else comes for her. So I ended up saying farewell to little Dot and Caspian (who is probably going to be nicknamed ‘Pants’, which is hilariously fitting), and I was so pleased with the outcome. Those two little trouble makers are going to make great pets, and I know they will provide endless entertainment. It’s so amazing they got adopted together; they truly are the unstoppable duo. I couldn’t have asked for better.

So here Grey remains, with little Indi and Jas. The house is certainly quieter. I got home from work tonight and the girls seemed very subdued. The weather is definitely cooler, but they weren’t screaming for their evening meal of natural meat that they love so much. Instead, all three are curled up around me and the heater. I think about leaving for Thailand in three weeks, and I wonder if any of them will still be here when I return.

Sam.

Quick trip to Christchurch

Tags

, , , , , ,

A few weeks ago I went down to Christchurch to work over a weekend. I am a very poor example of a Kiwi, as I had never been to the South Island before this. Born and bred New Zealanders grow up in this far-from-big country, where our Australasian relative, Australia, is known as ‘across the ditch’ some 1,500 miles away. For us, a group of islands, you don’t just drive to another country to spend the weekend. When Kiwis travel, they tend to travel – if you want to go anywhere foreign you have no choice but to sit on a plane for hours on end. Thus, venturing to the other main NZ island is the easiest thing to do while still exciting enough to call it a holiday or adventure. That is if you already live in the North Island; from what I can tell, journeying from the South Island up here isn’t too exciting.

Heading to the South Island for a mere weekend was not the way I would have chosen to make my first trip, but to be honest I was working most of the time so didn’t get to see much anyway. The South Island is gorgeous. My sister and her partner did a month-long roadtrip last summer and came back with some wonderful stories and photos. I think that’s how I would like to do it; a self-directed tour with enough time to spend seeing and exploring everything you want.

For those who don’t know, the city of Christchurch was hit by a 6.3 magnitude earthquake in February 2011. Buildings were destroyed, homes were wrecked, over a hundred lives lost. In a few moments, New Zealand and our mentality was changed forever. Just over two years on, the last morning I was in Christchurch we spent a few minutes walking around the central city – the ‘red zone’ – the most central area affected by the 2011 quake. Before the earthquake, the area had been home to one of the most beautiful cathedrals, was a hugely popular business district and housed cafes, restaurants, bars, clubs and retail outlets. Now, as I understand, it is a mere portion of its former self. Walking around the eerily quiet town centre, I find it hard to imagine the place being bustling with people and activity. There are still stores, markets and cafes, but everywhere you look there is a sense of emptiness, and of course the constant construction of a city rebuilding.

But it is still beautiful! It is colourful. Residents have taken what was left and transformed it into a hopeful testament of strength. The main messages I took from the short walk around the red zone was the positivity people still manage to draw to the surface even during times of extreme hardship. The Christchurch community is there for one another. I think I would have understood more if I had seen the same place before the 2011 quake. To those who knew it before, Christchurch would carry a much more powerful message. But for a New Zealander who had never walked through those streets before, it made me see just how resilient we can be, and it made me proud to be a kiwi.

The Bridge of Remembrance - one of two Christchurch war memorials

 

 

 

           Sam.

One month to go…

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

This year is going so quickly. Is anyone else finding this same phenomenon? Although, to be fair, I always find myself thinking this. I absolutely can’t wait to get over to Thailand to start work at the sanctuary. On the surface I do find myself feeling more nervous and even stressed when I realise how much I have to do before I leave, but underneath that is the bursting joy at knowing I am heading to do something good.

I had left family members with a way to donate to the journey if they so wished, but had not made any real efforts to fundraise. Last night one of my dearest friends set up a page on a website for me that allows for public donations (you can find it at http://www.givealittle.co.nz/cause/blameitonmywildheart), and all of a sudden more messages of support from friends and even some strangers have come through to me. It is almost overwhelming knowing so many people are supporting my venture, through messages, other contact and even contribution. I am grateful to each and every one of you, and I know the elephants and everyone involved in the Thai sanctuary is appreciative, too.
For those who are interested, the dear friend who set this donations page up for me – her name is Lisa – actually has her own running. Like me, she is a passionate environmentalist and is currently studying a degree in marine biology. Now, I don’t know how many of you out there have tried the full-time student life, but it isn’t easy. Lisa is traveling to Papua New Guinea in June to study their coral reefs. Reefs are ‘out of sight, out of mind’ for a lot of people, but these diverse ecosystems are suffering heavily from environmental change such as our own pollution. If you would like to help Lisa get to Papua New Guinea so she may study their coral reefs, you can head to http://www.givealittle.co.nz/cause/coralreef and find out more about her Cause.

It feels a fairly empty house tonight. Greywind and Jasmine are both here, but the three youngest kittens are – dare I say it – at the veterinary clinic for the night before having their desexing procedures in the morning. I did not mention it here, but a few weeks ago when I took them for their first vaccinations, I discovered that Doug and Indiana Jones are actually females!! Funnily enough, I just trusted their previous foster homes and didn’t even bother to check their sexes. Well, I learnt my lesson there! So now Dot and Indi are referred to as ‘she’ and ‘her’ as they ought to be! Sorry, girls!!

Once Price Caspian, Dot and Indi are microchipped, they will be 100% ready for new homes. I have yet to rehome Grey and Jasmine – I am certain the three youngest will find forever homes before I head to Thailand (this would be so much nicer than having to pass them to yet another foster home). If Grey or Jazzy are still in my care when I leave for Thailand, I am lucky in that I have someone here who will also look after them. The longer Grey is with us, though, the more I fall in love with her. I wouldn’t say she is absolutely attached to me (she can be quite an independent girl), but she certainly trusts me above all others. She will curl right up against me when she can, and still gives me those utterly contented, “I feel safe and comfortable” eyes. It is hard to picture her with anyone else. That doesn’t mean to say I don’t want someone to come along who is absolutely perfect for her. That would be a dream. Until that time, though, she gets all the love and attention possible. She has proven to be incredible with the younger kittens – Jasmine adores her, and will bunt her head and face against Greywind. Jasmine, being so shy and often a little skittish, really relaxes in Grey’s presence. Grey would rather hang out with humans, but she does let Jas cuddle up to her.

I’ll end this post with a few Easter kitten photos (the box is from Cadbury, whose palm oil formulas I do not support, but any boxes I find usually go to the foster cats) and try not to go to bed thinking about the massive list of errands I need to sort over the next few weeks!!

Sam.

Dot (aptly named - white dot on her tail!) makes it difficult to get anything done.

Dot (aptly named – white dot on her tail!) makes it difficult to get anything done.

Caspian

Caspian

Indi and Cass checking out a box

Indi and Cass checking out a box

Jasmine taking a peek

Jasmine taking a peek

Unfortunately, Grey didn't realise she's getting a bit too big...

Unfortunately, Grey didn’t realise she’s getting a bit too big…

...until it was too late

…until it was too late

The Wolf, the Woman, the Wilderness – Teresa tsimmu Martino – part I

Tags

, , , , , ,

e Wilderness coverThe Wolf, the Woman, the Wilderness
A True Story of Returning Home

The Wolf, the Woman, the Wilderness is a book written by Teresa tsimmu Martino, an author I hadn’t heard of until a friend from Oregon sent me some of her books as a gift some time after I had returned to New Zealand from the White Wolf Sanctuary. This book is a recollection of her life with a small pup of a wolf that she eventually realises must return ‘to the wild’. While she embarks on a journey to rehabilitate the wolf into wilderness, she also finds herself thinking greatly about her origins and what her own ultimate ‘wilderness’ might be. Teresa has a mixture of Italian and Native American descent, and while she previously hadn’t identified with either ethnic group (she had been living for a long time in Northern California working horses) she comes to realise something is calling her to rediscover her roots, her People and herself.
The little wolf, who she names Mckenzie, is a captive-born pure grey wolf that Teresa adopts from a closing rescue facility. Along with Mckenzie she takes Kip, a little black fox with a white-tipped tail. She brings them to her cabin four days drive away on an island in northwest America, back to where she already has a wolf-dog hybrid and a Weimaraner. As I was reading Teresa’s story, I envisaged the ‘island’ to be a place of quiet peace and contemplation. However, it is more a community filled with many different types of people and, as you would expect, she has to be careful of the wolves with her neighbours. She keeps Mckenzie in a pen, the size of which I am unsure, but large enough that she is able to dig a den under a tree.

I was not sure what to expect while reading this book. I knew I had kept it for some time because I hadn’t felt a right moment to open it. For a long time I have felt very disconnected from things I once held very close. When I went to America I had hoped to get some of this back, to find some answers to questions I cannot even piece aloud in my head, and to fill an empty void I have had inside me for longer than I can know. When I met the wolves for the first time, my heart swam. Whether you are spiritual or not, I felt spirits. Huge spirits. Ones that came home with me, back to the motel and continued swimming around me in celebration. I remember being so contented, and feeling so full I might burst.
As days went on and I became more and more accustomed to the power and content I felt around the wolves, I began to notice other voids open within me and become more empty. These were the unfinished spaces that I had left back home, and I knew I would have to go back and rediscover those left-behind things that were unknowingly deep down so important to me.
I found some answers in America. But mostly I found more questions, and am left with another great and unfilled void. My pull to the wolves is strong. Sometimes I wonder how it can be; how can you be born into this life so far from where you know you must belong? I know I belong both here, and over there with the wolves and the wilderness I want to rediscover. Here is my family. Here is my comfort, peace, here is joy. But there is where my fire burns; somewhere there I am attached. The attachment goes from the depths of my tummy; a long, invisible tugging cord, beckoning me back.
But immigration laws don’t make it so easy!! And so, here I am, tied between calm contentment and a fierce, calling passion.

There is a part in Teresa’s book where she recalls a friend from a Native tribe explaining the tie many individuals feel (but perhaps can’t explain) to a native people;
“…We were all Native peoples once.” This I believe. A Blackfeet friend told me about “wannabes.” A “wannabe” is a non-Native who wants to be Indian. He said that those people aren’t really “wannabes,” they are “used-to-bes.”
I like this very much. I like this, because it is something I wish to identify with. Those who know me have probably, at some point, recognised me feeling unrelated and unconnected with what I greatly refer to as ‘our culture’. The label of ‘Our culture’ is an easy way for me to distinguish the social norms of my generation and particular age group in our western New Zealand world, the expectations others have of us and the expectations we as a peer group have for each other. My partner has seen me walk away in ‘disgust’ at particular situations that I want no part of but are often pushed as the norm. During these times I go away and sit to think about a distant place where there may be people more akin to myself, my character and my understanding of the world around us. I am afraid because, from what I have constantly been told growing up, my ideas are unrealistic. Does this mean there aren’t people who see the world through more humble, equal eyes? Am I being told to resign myself to the fact that this is life, and this is who I am supposed to be? Am I supposed to care about the many things people around me seem to revere? Fashion, good wine, good food, alcohol, sex, physical beauty, getting high, money… All these things make me want to walk away, down a forested path to another world that exists somewhere here. All these things I find superficial and so unimportant. All these things make me anxious. I’m not saying I don’t enjoy food. I feel special if I go to a nice restaurant in good company. But not once do I forget others. Others who don’t have a scrap. Others who wouldn’t understand this picky, clicky, peer-pressured, power-pressured ‘culture’ a lot of us are consumed by. I don’t want to be consumed. I don’t want to pretend I am consumed so that I fit in with the false and unimportant norm. I am tired of running with it. I want to walk down that forested path, away from all this. When I speak of this out loud to those close to me I am often told I’m running away. But I more think I am returning home.
Of course, I don’t know if when I embark on a journey hoping to find something to fill me up that I won’t just be disappointed. I remember going to the Pow Wow in Siletz. I took myself there with a heart full of fear of not being accepted. I was also, perhaps even more so, afraid of not being recognised or understood and welcomed. I met some great people there, although I was far too shy to approach anyone outside of the market. I did learn a lot about a more ancient culture, and found I felt more at home at the Pow Wow than I do in many social gatherings back in New Zealand. Perhaps that is just one little piece of one individual girl’s Who Am I search.

In Teresa’s journey to find her people, the Osage, she receives a book of their native language. She learns that Wah Kon Tah – “The Mystery” – translates to what many of us refer to as God. She incorporates it into the way she views the world, and it seems to bring her comfort. I see this as a humble way to live. Teresa points out we like to think we know everything. Everything is categorised. Different religions have rules, and labels, even though we are so often drawing strength from the same beliefs. While ‘The Mystery’ does not seem like a personal enough term, it is indeed a humble way to identify with something there but out of one’s control.

Teresa finds her search for the meaning of wilderness to be intertwined with her journeys of finding her people and releasing Mckenzie. Teresa has a struggle in trying to decide what is right for the little wolf Mckenzie. She gets different advice from different people – of course, those with careers in federal wildlife protection are against her releasing Mckenzie. She seeks the aid of an animal rehabilitation centre that, after initially agreeing to take the wolf, end up telling Teresa it is illegal to have a pure-bred wolf in her possession and that the rescue facility could end up being greatly penalized for assisting in any way. She is relieved in part (the thought of handing Mckenzie over to strangers was emotionally difficult), but her frustration is apparent. In her book she admits she has no idea of the ‘right’ way to go about releasing a captive animal into the wild. A great part of it, she realises, is to do with her also ‘rehabilitating’ herself, and accepting wilderness back into her life. She writes:

In the north you tie out the dog. When they hear the wolf’s howl the dogs bark and shiver, both in fear and longing to return to the pack. If the wolf comes close, two things can happen: A playful bow and a quick way of the tail that means, Come! Join us! Or the soft stalking walk of hunger in glaring yellow eyes.
But wildness is a hard walk. It is a walk up mountains that makes you hungry and thirsty. There are stones that cut your knees and you fall. There are lions that are real with claws. And they can kill you with little effort. But the air is clean and cool and you can see a long way from those peaks into Tomorrow and back to Yesterday. And Now sits like a butterfly on your outstretched hand.
Come, Sister! the wolves howl, put away your fear and run with us for a while. Join the rainbow and live before you die. You must die of something. Live outside the cage. Then you won’t become like a captive naked ape, interested only in sex and violence. You are a wild creature pure like wolves, beautiful like horses.

Through learning to live in the wild, Teresa can thus teach Mckenzie – and so she decides to take Mckenzie regularly into the mountains, to hunt and sleep and live for days at a time, both meeting lessons imperative to survival.

I’m not sure how to take the rest of the book. It is a lovely story, heartfelt and heartbreaking. It talks about the strong ties one human individual feels for an animal, something that cannot speak the same language or communicate in the same ways. I understand this kind of bond, which was why having to accept Mckenzie must eventually return to her own kind was something I found sad. I don’t know if it is compassion that drives my strong emotional responses to certain situations, but sometimes I do find it difficult to take an objective stance. It also made me read certain passages of Teresa’s book with mixed feelings – for example, she talks about a roadkill doe found and fed to the animals with milk still dripping from its teats, and notes that there will be a hungry fawn out there somewhere. This is all part of the cycle of life and death, yes, but at what point does one individual’s life outweigh the importance of another’s? I care about the health of wolf populations, but I also care about the welfare of individuals – carnivores need to hunt and feed, but I know when I witness a filmed hunt and the death of a prey species I feel strongly sorry and bad for the victim animal. I suppose I just don’t like suffering full stop, so when it comes to the cycle of life sustaining life, the quicker death is the better.‘Wilderness’ includes all this – life for life, death for the continuation of a cycle. I think many see the concept of true wilderness as a feared thing – we keep a wild animal as a pet and in doing so contain a piece of wilderness inside our own world. We take, and shape wilderness to fit our desires, whether or not what we do is right or wrong.

I am halfway through the book, and it is getting late here, so I shall try and write some kind of conclusion (hopefully more eloquent than tonight’s post) once I am finished tomorrow :)

Sam.

America – Wolves: Humans and Wolves

Tags

, , , , , , ,

I find myself getting hugely frustrated at reading news articles about the constant rollercoaster of animal and conservation rights. Media is an enormous battleground through which people with the most diverse opinions can proclaim their judgements and views, and there will never be any fully mutual agreement on any issue.
Us humans often determine what can and can’t exist in an ecosystem. Sometimes decisions are even made in regards to populations of other humans. We have intentionally driven groups of species out of particular areas, and completely eradicated them from whole regions. Of course the wolf is no exception, and the ongoing wolf-human crusade is an infamous one.

Humans are a major cause of wolf mortality in much of the wolf’s current range. For many people the wolf is the ultimate symbol of wilderness, a respected and even revered creature. Others however see wolves as a sign of economic loss, a symbol of nature out of control, or even an intentionally evil beast.
Throughout the history of the human-wolf relationship since our introduction to their species, our perceptions of them have greatly changed and varied. Likewise, the wolf’s range has waxed and waned thanks to this. Very often historical persecution of the wolf has been out of proportion to the threat it actually posed to people.
It has been proposed that we, as humans, are genetically built to feel fear and disdain in regards to certain natural situations and stimuli in order to help us to survive. For example, many of us have an instinctual fear of snakes and poisonous insects, which could be due to years of evolved thinking leading to an inherent response. Ethnographic studies have shown that many early cultures did not fear wolves, and in fact treated them as equals; respecting them for their social bonds and admiring them for their hunting skills. Nomadic indigenous people of North America regarded wolves as spiritually powerful, intelligent and socially-complex animals. Yes they were hunted and trapped, rarely with guilt or malice, and often with rituals and apologies to the spirit of the wolves. Wolves were not spoken harshly about, these indigenous peoples did not brag about their ability to capture and kill wolves, nor would they announce their intention to hunt them (to do so could offend wolves or other animals). The wolf did not evoke fear, and yet they were eventually set out in early western literature as wicked, immoral creatures.
The changes in Western thought about the environment fully turned the generally positive views of the wolf. Humans switched from considering themselves part of the natural world, to ‘master’ of it. Even scientific writings before the mid-twentieth century typically portrayed the wolf in a negative light. For example, from The Natural History of Quadrupeds published in 1828:
“Wolves are such ferocious and useless creatures that all other animals detest them, yea they even hate each other, and therefore scarcely ever live together, each one in its own separate hole… Perhaps of all other animals, wolves are the most hateful while living and the most useless when dead… The continual agitations of this restless animal renders him so furious, that he frequently ends his life in madness.”
It was not until the mid-twentieth century that Western culture considered the wolf worthy of scientific inquiry.

During the late 1800s, settlers and market hunters decimated many ungulate populations with barely a thought, and large numbers of sheep and cattle were introduced into open range in the American West. Wolves and other large predators, with a lack of natural wild prey, were forced to increasingly turn to livestock to survive. This, of course, led to a human determination to have these animals killed. In 1915 Congress established the federal Bureau of Biological Survey and its Division of Predator and Rodent Control (PARC) with the mission of eliminating wolves and other large predators from all federal lands. The threat to livestock became the strongest argument for killing every last wolf at taxpayer expense – even in areas far from livestock range. By 1930 wolves had been almost completely exterminated from the American West.
By 1940 a proposition was put forward to restore wolves to Yellowstone National Park, where they had been eradicated by the government only a decade earlier. This pushed for more, concise scientific research of the wolf, and by 1960 more and more researchers were presenting objective and balanced information about wolves and argued for their conservation.
The 1963 book Never Cry Wolf by Farley Mowat (a wonderful read, in my opinion) was the first positive presentation of wolves in popular literature (even though much of its ‘fact’ was actually fiction) and a Disney film based on the book reached millions. From here, attitudes toward the wolf became increasingly favourable, which coincided with a general change in the perception and care of wildlife and the environment. Legal protection of game animals was finally extended to various predators, and bounties were gradually eliminated.
Now, however, there is a different story. We are bombarded with massive extremes of opinions – in favour of and opposing wolves – and everything imaginable in between. Agriculturists (farmers, ranchers, etc.) hold the most negative views of wolves – often regardless of whether they live near a wolf population or not. The most positive and protectionist views of wolves are held by urban people and members of environmental organisations. Some studies have indicated that greater knowledge and factual education of wolves is related to a more positive attitude about them. However, many urbanites with little knowledge of wolves are highly positive about the animals too. People favourable toward wolves and their restoration tend to cite values related to ecosystem completeness; the right of the wolf to exist; and recreational value. Reasons for opposing wolves or their restoration include the expectation of attacks on livestock, pets and humans; cost; declines in big game populations; erosion of private property rights; and fear of more restrictions on the private use of federal land.

I want to be one of the more educated people who are able to form clear, well-informed opinions on wolves and their interactions with the environment. I am admittedly biased, but I do like to think I keep myself informed where possible so I can still feel confident about any education I pass on to others.

Wolf biologists face a variety of challenges in different parts of the world. They may have many supporters, but even supporters have hugely varied views and demands. Wolf education has been a huge part of wolf conservation promotion, but this has been harmful when inaccurate information has been put across. An unbiased portrayal of wolf and wolf management issues can be difficult because far too often ethical and other subjective values are involved, and wolf ‘education’ can easily reflect personal values. As I said, I am certainly not unbiased when it comes to the education of wolves and wolf conservation, but I try to take in as much factual information available as I can to ensure my views are evidence-based and well-rounded. I have no doubt that I will always, however, be on the side of the wolf.
A huge pressing issue in the whole wolf debate is the economic value involved. The western world is run by money, so now for any argument you are going to have to involve economic value somewhere along the line to support your points. In the past it was believed by most of society that the wolf had a mainly negative economic impact through killing livestock and game animals. An abundance of money has been spent on the control or eradication of wolves because of this – management requires substantial resources to be effective. The least expensive management methods (poisoning and aerial shooting by the public) often come with a negative perception by the public eye. We are now, however, increasingly able to assess the positive economic benefits of wolf restoration, a main factor being tourism returns.
Depredation on livestock has become a main reason for attempts to exterminate the wolf. Wolves do prey on domestic animals in every country where the two coexist. Aside from economic loss, the very threat of depredation creates stress for livestock producers. Human ingenuity and technology have so far been unable to resolve this conflict, short of eradicating wolves in areas near livestock.
Most attacks on livestock occur where prey is scarce. In fact, studies have shown that wolves will actually hunt wild prey species when given the option of natural prey and introduced livestock. Most fatalities occur when livestock herds are in untended areas, when carcasses are near, and when young are available. Research has shown a decrease in livestock depredation in areas where natural ungulate prey has been restored.
Agriculturists generally view wolves as relentless killers regardless of facts. Cattle producers in eighteen western U.S. states reported losses of 1,400 cattle to wolves in 1991, 1,200 of which were reported in states where wolves did not even exist. The reality is that yet, wolves prey on livestock especially when natural prey is scarce. They have been known to also prey on domestic animals such as herding dogs. However, evidence shows that in most areas less than 30% of damage has been caused by wolves – very often it is coyotes, wild dogs and domestic dogs responsible. Compensation programs or state insurance help offset economic losses in some areas, and may be a positive temporary means of assistance for agriculturists, but is not a sufficient long-term measure. Where wolves prey on livestock, some form of wolf management is generally inevitable – whether legal or illegal. During my 2010 stay in several western U.S. states I frequently heard the term “shoot, shovel and shut up”. Nonlethal means of wolf control have been attempted, including translocation of wolves, using guard dogs, and placing wolves in permanent captivity (which is a huge stress for individual animals; wild wolves adapt poorly to confinement), but these have not been notably successful. Fencing, propane exploders, pyrotechnics and other techniques have met with only limited success because wolves eventually habituate to them.
It is easy for me to support wolves; I do not sustain my family or my way of life on livestock that are in danger of wolf predation, I do not live in a community that has any kind of predator to be wary of (apart from the human type) and perhaps this allows me to have such a strong opposing attitude towards those who I see as destructive and uncompassionate in regards to wildlife. We absolutely honour our native species in New Zealand. Pest control is a huge effort that we rarely don’t support. What gets me is that wolves are perceived as a ‘pest’ species in countries where they are in fact native. The two just don’t go together for me, and if I allow myself to get honestly emotional about it I can say that it frankly makes me feel a little sick. I don’t understand the mentality that a creature that naturally evolved on the very soil people now claim as theirs is an undesired and even reviled thing.

Another argument in place opposing wolves is the risk they pose to humans. As mentioned, many see the wolf as the ultimate symbol of wilderness, a great portion believing wolves are incompatible with our civilizations. However, people may see it this way because wolves are especially exterminated in areas of human settlement, creating a misconception that they require a habitat free of human influences to survive. This is untrue, however, and most of the world’s wolves now actually live somewhere near people and do encounter the sights, sounds and scents of civilization in their daily travels. Wolves are cunningly adaptive, and many have learn to avoid roads, ski trails, train tracks and general signs of human occupation, and in some  populations have learnt to only travel near towns at night. Wolves show a surprising willingness to live near humans, especially in areas where they have legal protection. They have been known to den in abandoned houses, drain pipes, and survive near military facilities where they must adapt to loud, once novel noises.
Alright, so here we go – the fuss about attacks on humans. “A dead child within a year” was predicted by Montana’s U.S. Senator who opposed wolf reintroduction to Yellowstone (which has since proven to be a huge success). A review of reports in 1971 showed that most wolf attacks in Euope and central Asia were cause by wolf-dog hybrids, ‘tame’ wolves, or rabid wolves. A second review from northern Italy found about 440 accounts of wolf attacks resulting in human death, and this was stretch over the fifteenth to nineteenth centuries. Again, many of these were suggested to have occurred with captive wolves ‘turned feral’.
Wolves more habituated to humans are more likely to attack livestock and people. The most compelling evidence of wolves killing humans comes from India, where a single bold wolf was found to be responsible for attacking roughly 76 children over a seven month period. In this area, small children were allowed to roam untended and they outnumbered unguarded livestock. Wild prey was also scarce.
There is a very low number of recorded reports of wolf attacks on humans ‘in the wild’. Following European settlement, many observers on the Western frontier were astonished that wolves did not actually kill humans, in view of the stories they had heard. Reports of attacks we do have show that it is mostly captive wolves, rabid wolves, wolf-dog hybrids, or wolves in areas of prey scarcity that are responsible. Considering the fact that each day millions of people live, work and recreate in areas occupied by wolves, attacks by wild wolves are relatively rare and fatal attacks are even rarer.

I understand that there is the potential for harm to come to human life when in close proximity to a wolf or wolves, especially with different contributing factors in play such as prey scarcity, the wolf’s perception of threat level, etc. However, I do not believe this is fair reason to push for wolf eradication or to excuse the uncontrolled hunting of them. Of course, that is partially my biased opinion coming into play, but I do not support the uncontrolled hunting of any species, so it is a consistent belief. I most definitely do not think it is just reason to portray the wolf as an ‘evil’ or ‘man-eating’ creature. Large, carnivorous mammals all have the potential to pose a danger to human life. Hiking in the forests of Oregon by myself I was aware that bear and mountain cats were part of the ecosystem, and accepted the potential for danger. This does not make either of those creatures ‘evil’, and I would rather share a habitat with such species while aware of the risk, instead of driving them out completely as we have done in so, so many areas. And really, what kills the most number of other species?? We do, of course – but we shape the environment to suit our ‘needs’, and so we excuse our own behaviour. If animals had higher cognitive abilities they would run in fear at the mention of us. (And no, I don’t believe that just because we are the ‘most intelligent’ species on our earth we ‘deserve’ to kill everything around us. I reiterate: we have a choice.)

I would like to mention wolf-hybrids, another form of human exploitation and a manifestation of the modern fascination with wolves. Accurate information about the numbers of captive wolves and wolf hybrids is impossible to determine. It is illegal to own a pure wolf in the United States, but hybrids are subject to little, if any regulation in all but a few states. States that do try to regulate ownership encounter complex problems relating to genetic identification. An unknown number of ‘tame’ wolves and hybrids are released into the wild in the US, and distinguishing these animals from wild wolves can be difficult or even impossible. This poses a problem for wolf conservation for many important reasons, one being that these animals have very little fear of humans and so pose a higher danger.
I am absolutely against keeping wolves as ‘pets’, and am equally against everything about hybridizing wolves and dogs. People seem to think a wolf-dog hybrid is just like a dog in regards to behaviour but it ‘looks cooler’ and is often, perhaps without being outright advertised as so, used as a status symbol, as are wolves. However, wolf-dogs are far more dangerous, less manageable than dogs, have little fear of humans as I mentioned, and attack risk to humans is much higher.
Wolves belong in the wild. Wolf-dog hybrids do not belong at all. It is not okay to breed wolf-dog hybrids and release them into the wild – the negative effects this can have on wild wolf populations is immeasurable. I similarly believe that it is not okay to have a wolf as a ‘pet’. Wild animals should never be kept or treated as pets.
I remember one instance at the White Wolf Sanctuary that I have already talked about in a previous post. A man came for a tour with his family, and was obviously not a wolf fan from the get-go. His children, however, were very interested in them, and he kept his mouth shut for a long while until the end of Lois’ (founder and director of the WWS) educational presentation. He then spoke up and told us that he once owned a wolf-dog, and said that when it became useless he ‘released it back into the wild’ as if he had done a good thing. Nothing about owning a wolf-dog hybrid is a good thing, and Lois was absolutely riled – for good reason – to hear that he had ‘released’ the animal like he’d done it a favour. She told him the truth of the matter without holding back; if the wolf-dog survived, it had the potential to breed with wild wolves and degrade their population and genetic purity. More likely, though, wolves would kill the wolf-dog hybrid at first sight. An animal kept captive its whole life is not automatically going to know proper survival behaviour and tactics, and if it had not encountered any wolves to kill it, the reality is that it would slowly starve to death.
We moved on quickly to the next part of the tour after this, and the man said nothing. At the time I felt bad that this had been laid out to him so bluntly, but the more I realised what a common theme this wolf-dog hybrid idea was, the more I realised it poses a major issue. People who think they can ‘own’ wild animals quite frankly disturb me. People who think they have the right to breed or buy wolf-dog hybrids similarly irritate and exasperate me. The difference between a zoo, a rescue sanctuary such as WWS, and someone owning a wild animal as a pet or for personal use is HUGE. Readers, I implore you, PLEASE do not ‘own’ wild animals as pets!!! That is not where they belong, and you are not helping conservation efforts.

I do think we as a species revere ourselves far too much, and need to take a step back. We need to realise that if we destroy everything around us for the sake of money… well, money isn’t going to sustain us once the environment is gone, is it? A balance needs to be reached when making decisions on species recovery and conservation. I automatically like to believe that we ought to support as much species recovery as possible, but often this is not beneficial to individual animal welfare; with high population densities and more spread-out species numbers, they are more likely to get in the way of human operations and thus the cycle begins again and more individuals are trapped, killed and populations culled. I have heard that America may be changing their management strategies for wolves in the lower 48 states. This is something I would like to know more about, so if anyone has any information I would greatly appreciate some insight. It seems like reaching a neutral point when deciding the fate of the wolf is far off indeed.

Sam.

http://www.whitewolfsanctuary.com

And then there were… five?

Tags

, , ,

Well, I have been completely inattentive to blogging the last little while, as some have noticed. Various things have contributed to this; getting settled into a new job, moving house (how I truly hope I that doesn’t have to happen again for a while!), and, most annoyingly, my little point-and-shoot camera deciding only a couple of weeks after purchase that it wouldn’t do its job. Things are back on track now though, and while I’m working on a wolf-related post I thought I would update everyone on the kitten escapades.

The last time I posted about my foster kittens was when I rehomed Felix last month. Since then Greywind has, shall we say, acquired a few extra friends. Yes, okay, okay, I admit it; it only took a day for the new landlord to give me the a-okay on kitten fostering and I had four new fluffballs running around inside. It was extremely bitter sweet. Greywind had absolutely loved her littermates, and play time was just the best thing ever. She had seemed quite lonely after Felix was rehomed (even though there was another resident cat at the last place we were staying, but he was definitely not fond of Greywind so she had to stay out of his way!), so I thought she would love to have new friends. But I was so wrong! When I introduced them for the first time the newbies were more than willing to build a swift friendship, but Greywind wouldn’t have a bar of it and simply hissed and spit at them.

Wary first meetings

Wary first meetings

I think a big factor in this was that previous resident cat had very often tried to attack Greywind, and she possibly expected these new little strangers to do the same. Although I knew deep down it would take some time, space and patience, I had wanted everyone to be happy with things right away. I really felt guilty about Greywind and made sure she continued to get quality time without smaller kittens tearing around; in Felix’s absence she had really become a big fan of her human family and I didn’t want her to feel as though she was being pushed out.

Thankfully, it only took another day or so for her to accept that most of the kittens weren’t a threat. Yummy food was a catalyst in this of course, and I was so excited when they shared their first meal together.

First meal together

First meal together

Little Grey

Little Grey

Isn’t Grey looking gorgeous? She has grown into such a beautiful young lady. I keep saying she is so mature for her age, too! Although, the kittens have definitely brought out the extremely playful side in her again, which is awesome to see. I am quite sad she hasn’t found a home yet, as much as I adore her and have trouble imagining her with someone else. She is still very shy of strangers, but I know it will just take the right person/family to settle her in patiently and with lots of TLC, and she will make such a wonderful companion. I see her as my little buddy; she is so independent during the day but at night loves nothing else but to sleep as close as she can (when she’s not asked to sleep with the other kittens, that is). I’ve had her since last year and sometimes I wonder why there hasn’t been any interest with her, but I’m hoping the right time will come along when it’s meant to.

Let me introduce the new little mischief-makers. They have had two other foster homes before me – I’m not sure what happened with the first, but the last people looking after them went on holiday for several weeks so needed to find somewhere else to place them. They are completely different to how Greywind’s litter was when I first got them. Where Grey’s litter were absolutely feral and unhandleable, these kittens are SO friendly! I don’t know their background, but they certainly aren’t shy. They love any person the second they walk in the door, and are probably over-confident as so many kittens are. There are three boys, about seven weeks old – Indiana Jones, Caspian (mister Prince Caspian) and Doug. The fourth kitten is from a separate litter and is about three months old, but is almost as small as the others. She was the runt of her litter and apparently had quite a rough start. She is extremely shy, but an absolute princess once she gets settled, and we have been calling her Jasmine.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Doug

Doug

Doug

Doug

Indiana Jones

Indiana Jones

Prince Caspian

Prince Caspian

Indiana and Cass

Indiana and Cass

Today Lonely Miaow held an ‘Adoptathon’ at a local community centre, and invited foster homes to bring their kittens along if they were ready for adoption. As Doug, Indie and Cass are too young and haven’t been desexed yet, I took Greywind and Jasmine over with the hopes that one or even both might get adopted. It was a great turn out and a lot of the cats there did get adopted – even a gorgeous big boy about five years old, which is awesome! Jazzy and Grey, however, were just too frightened to be themselves and although they did gain some interest I ended up bringing them home at the end of the day. Though I was hoping their new parents might show up today, I was quite glad to bring them back home to an environment where they are absolutely comfortable. It really was a long day for them and they are probably more suited to prospective parents coming for a home-viewing as opposed to taking them out of their comfort zones.

Today was an absolutely wonderful opportunity to meet other foster ‘mums’ and other Lonely Miaow staff. The staff are absolutely dedicated to the cause and were positive the whole day, meeting and greeting and really helping us realise we are contributing to something positive right here in our local areas. I have huge admiration for every person there today, including those who came to adopt a rescue cat or kitten. I hope more and more people decide to adopt rescue animals the next time they are looking for a pet. It’s one of the most rewarding things you can do, in my opinion!

Sam.

Early days of moving in and getting settled together

Early days of moving in and getting settled together

http://www.lonelymiaow.co.nz

More on cats in New Zealand

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

I’ve had more of a think about this anti-cat campaign that has caused such hot debate in New Zealand at the moment. With my current job I hear from people who take all sorts of different standpoints, and in discussions I try to stay as far away from an emotional viewpoint as possible – but now I’ve decided that actually, emotional reasoning is a fair way to consider the issue. After all, as I said in my previously related post, we alter our environment to suit our own needs – and this includes for emotional fulfilment.

Take little Greywind as an example. I tell you, this little girl has really come out of her shell. She is still shy around strangers and will quite often disappear into her cat tunnel or under the bed, but we had some folks over the other night for dinner and she came out so show off and make some mischief. I have just moved house this week (let’s not talk about moving… it’s so exhausting!) and she has a whole place to herself – well, doesn’t she know it!

We were having a cuddle on the couch when I realised – how could you want to get rid of animals that bring so much joy and companionship? When she is not in a playful mood, her first choice is to hop up on my lap and get as close as she can to me – at night this means snuggling right against my face. She purrs, so loudly, tips her head back and just looks at you with these big, adoring-looking eyes!

So, why are we here? I believe the point of life is to be as happy as possible, and doing what you are passionate about (while preferably positively contributing to the world in whatever way you can). We have introduced many species to New Zealand for our own use. How much of native land has been ravaged and turned into paddocks and pastures for our livestock, just to support our lifestyles and industry? Our cities have completely destroyed any hope a flourishing ecosystem has to establish in those areas. We work so hard to shape things into what’s most convenient and appealing to us, often without a second thought at the impact we are having or even if we can alter our ways to lessen the extent of the marks we make. Therefore, why are we being asked to suddenly remove something that brings so much happiness when there are so many other changes we could instead make to procure a positive change?

The massive benefits a relationship with a companion animal can bring into one’s life are infinite. Being asked to cull a member of one’s family because it might be hunting native species gets me riled when really we should be putting an end to the blatant environment-destroying acts we ourselves do every day. That’s something we as individuals have some control over. We have the conscious decision to use more sustainable products. We have the conscious decision to educate ourselves on more environment-friendly living. We have the ability to decide which companies and even industries we support. If we believe our pets are harming native wildlife, then we can do something about it that doesn’t involve ridding the whole country of particular companion animals. Again, cats in the city aren’t out in national parks every night killing animals – it’s all perspective and context. None of my foster kittens hunt any animal while under my care. I really am sounding like a massive cat advocate, and as I have already said – I have a degree in conservation and agree that our native wildlife is in danger. But when the whole point of us establishing massive civilizations at the cost of native habitat is to keep ourselves happy and thriving, I think there are other things we ought to focus on before taking away something that brings so much joy to so many.

 

Sam.

America – Wolves: Diseases

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Growing up, fairytales such as Little Red Ridinghood and the Three Little Pigs taught me to perceive wolves as evil, vindictive creatures. During early childhood I remember studying carnivores at school and I always felt a strong sympathetic emotional consideration for prey species. I still do – I dislike pain in all its forms – but I certainly have a better understanding of the ecological world now. I have mentioned in an earlier post that it wasn’t until high school that I truly began to explore my passion for wildlife, and wolves as species. It was then that I began to learn about the struggles their species and others must experience just to survive. It is not an easy life, even when you take human interference out of the picture!

 

PARASITES

Internal and external (endo- and ectoparasites) are almost everywhere. And of course, naturally, different parasites plague wolf populations commonly if not constantly. The aim of a parasite is generally not to kill its main host but to allow the host to continue to survive whilst the parasite benefits. Wolves do tolerate a wide range of parasites without significant hardship, however parasitic infections can become seriously detrimental or even fatal especially when factors such as malnutrition or viral disease are also weakening the wolf.

Protozoan Parasites

Protozoan parasites are unicellular organisms in which metabolism and locomotion are carried out by organelles within the cell. Deaths have been reported in wolves from Isospora (which causes coccidiosis, a disease of the intestinal tract), Toxoplasma (causing toxoplasmosis, a zoonotic disease) and Babesia (causes babesiosis, a haemolytic disease where red blood cells are destroyed). Wolves have also been known to host Sarcocystis and Giardia. While Giardiasis is not uncommon in dogs, it has not been known to cause major suffering or morbidity in wolves.

Helminth Parasites

Helminth parasites (commonly known as worms – yuck!) have three major groups that use wolves as definite hosts.

Trematodes – also known as ‘flukes’. These worms have flattened, one-piece bodies. They use suckers, hooks or clamps to attach themselves to internal organs, either inside the organ or outside its walls. Trematodes may use several intermediate hosts before establishing themselves inside a wolf’s body, including slugs or snails and a mammal species preyed on by the wolf. Common flukes found in wolves include Alaria (a lifestage of which develops in tadpoles and frogs which are then ingested by the wolf or small rodent) and Metorchis conjunctus (also known as ‘liver fluke’ – its larvae live in fish to be ingested by wolves). Most trematodes known to infect wolves inhabit the intestinal tract, liver or lungs.

Cestodes – ‘tapeworms’. Ungulates, small mammals and fish harbour tapeworm larvae – wolf prey species. Tapeworms range from a few millimetres in length to several meters long (for example Diphyllobothrium latum, whose intermediate host is a fish, can reach lengths of up to 20 metres! That makes me feel queasy). Their bodies consist of a head (usually with suckers or hooks for attachment) and a strobila (the bulk of the tapeworm’s body) which is made of a number of segments (proglottids). Each proglottid contains both male and female sexual organs, therefore eggs can be self-fertilised as well as cross-fertilised. Segments containing fertilised eggs break off either singly or in groups and are shed in the wolf’s faeces. The gravid segments then go on to break down in the environment, releasing the eggs. An intermediate host then ingests an egg, the egg hatches inside the host and the tapeworm embryo penetrates the intestinal wall of its host for further development. When a wolf eats the intermediate host, the larval tapeworm attaches to the intestinal wall and develops into an adult inside the wolf.
Tapeworms can cause serious problems depending on number and size of worms, and the susceptibility and sensitivity of the host. Ill effects include intestinal blockage (due to numerous, large strobila), generalised toxis or allergic reactions, mechanical irritation of the intestinal musocsa, nutrient deprivation of the host, secondary bacterial infection of the intestine and absorption of proteins and vitamins from the intestinal mucosa.
Larval infections of the intermediate host are more serious than adult infections of the definitive host. Larvae produce cysts in which to develop, and these can promote neoplastic symptoms that can eventually destroy the host’s liver, and germinal tissues of the liver cysts commonly metastasize to other organs. Deaths in humans due to such infections have been recorded; no drugs are effective in killing the larvae, and complete surgical removal of such cysts is extremely difficult as cells of any ruptured cysts simply spread the infection further.
An intermediate host weakened by a parasitic infection can be advantageous to hunting wolves, and many kills have been observed to be ridden with parasites. This also, of course, ensures a continuation of the tapeworm lifecycle.

Nematodes – roundworms. Roundworms are elongated, unsegmented, and vary greatly in size. They usually inhabit the intestine but can be found in other organs such as the heart or kidney. Life cycles also vary from simple (e.g. the shed eggs from one definitive host are ingested by another) to complex (involving more than one intermediate host). The larvae of some species penetrate the skin or mouth and migrate to the lungs, where they are coughed up and swallowed to become mature adult roundworms in the intestine. Sexes are usually separate and roundworms can be dimorphic.
While most roundworm infections are benign, fatalities do occur – especially in adults harbouring large numbers of worms and in pups. Toxocara canis is a hookworm that is commonly found in wolf pups and has been known to cause death by pneumonia (caused by intestinal blockage leading to aspiration of vomitus). Pups can be infected in utero with this particular worm. The giant kidney worm, Dioctophyma renale, has been found in wolves. This parasite develops in the kidney after larvae are ingested, and they have been known to reach lengths of up to one metre with a diameter of one centimetre in wolves. The presence of D. renale in the kidney results in the complete destruction of functional tissue, leaving only a distended and thickened capsule. The ureter remains functional and allows passage of eggs into the urine. To compensate for the loss of one kidney, the other kidney hypertrophies (increases in volume). If both kidneys are parasitized, the infection is fatal.

The dog heartworm, Dirofilaria immitis, has been found in both captive and free-ranging gray wolves as well as in red wolves. Dogs can tolerate low levels of heartworm infection for many years without showing clinical signs, but large numbers of these worms can cause cardiac enlargement, chronic passive congestion and death. Dogs are especially susceptible to serious effects during periods of exertion.

Acanthocephalans – thorny-headed worms. This fourth group rarely infects wolves, however secondary bacterial infection can result in perforation of the gut.

Diagnosis – diagnosis of helminths requires a microscope unless shed segments can be seen with the naked eye in faeces. Heartworm infection can be diagnosed by microscopic examination of the blood or by serology tests. There are treatments available, but not all lifestages of all species of helminths have a treatment.

Ectoparasites

Examples of external parasites include fleas, ticks and lice. Generally most ectoparasites are simply an annoyance, but some can be fatal. Perhaps the most harmful wolf ectoparasite is the mange mite, Sarcoptes scabiei. These mites can be spread to new hosts by direct body contact. The life cycle of the sarcoptic mite includes egg, larva, nymph and adult. All active stages have the capability to burrow into the skin, but most burrows are made by fertilized females that lay their eggs in the burrow. Burrowing causes intense pruritis (severe itching of the skin), scab formation, hyperkeratosis (thickening of the skin) and seborrhoea especially on the head and neck. In advanced stages the whole body may be involved, causing emaciation, decreased mobility, staggering and death.
Obviously, this mange can be a serious threat to wolves. Widespread mange can result in high mortality rates, especially amongst pups, and can quickly cull a large percentage of a population – in fact, whole populations can be affected by this disease.

Lice can cause high morbidity in wolf packs, but probably not high mortality. A louse epizootic has been known to cause alopecia and seborrhoea, with up to 75% of wolves’ bodies involved. Self-inflicted trauma caused by the associated pruritis results in inflammation and infection.

Certain ticks can transmit a variety of diseases, some of which can be fatal to wolves.

Diagnosis – most ectoparasites can be seen with the unaided eye. Louse eggs may be seen attached to hair, and mites can be observed by microscopic examination of skin scrapings of affected sites. There are several treatments for a range of ectoparasites available that have mostly been designed for dogs or cattle, but may be used in wolves.

VIRUSES

Rabies
Rabies is an acute infectious disease of the central nervous system caused by a rhabdovirus that generally persists as a salivary gland infection of carnivores. Rabies is one of the oldest recorded infectious diseases, enzootic on every continent except Australia (here in New Zealand we are completely rabies-free). Wolves are not considered to be the primary vector of rabies except in the Mediterranean region and India – dogs are foxes are. Rabies is almost always transmitted by bite, but has also been demonstrated to spread via aerosol routes. The incubation period in wolves is 8-21 days, whereas in dogs that contracted it from rabid wolves experience an incubation period of 17-39 days. In humans it can be as short as 9-11 days following severe injury inflicted by a rabid wolf. No controlled studies on wolves have been conducted, and so signs in wolves are mostly anecdotal.
There are two forms of rabies: Dumb and Furious. Dumb rabies is characterised by early paralysis of the throat, loss of voice, excessive salivation, general paralysis and death. There is little inclination to bite from Dumb rabies. Furious rabies proceeds through three stages:
1)      Prodromal period: the animal exhibits abnormal behaviour, modification of voice and increased salivation,
2)      Excitement phase: the animal becomes severely agitated and attacks inanimate objects, wanders aimlessly, bites other animals,
3)      Paralytic phase: voice is lost, the tongue protrudes from a paralyzed jaw, and further paralysis soon leads to death.
These signs do not necessarily apply to wild animals under all conditions. Most documented wolf attacks on humans have been attributed to rabies; the disease makes a wolf lose its ‘fear’ of humans. Rabies is easily spread because the disease encourages agitation in animals thus promoting them to roam long distances.
Clinical rabies in wolves is untreatable. There are rabies vaccinations available for dogs that may be useful in wolves.

Canine Distemper
This is a febrile (fever-causing) disease of carnivores caused by a parmyxovirus. It is a world-wide problem in domestic dogs, but reports in free-ranging wildlife are few.
Canine distemper is spread by aerosol or direct contact, including from faeces and urine. Within days of exposure, signs of the disease appear. Signs include oral jaundice and ulceration, swollen feet, anorexia, ataxia (loss of control of body movements), dyspnoea (laboured breathing) and neurological abnormalities.
Despite evidence of being exposed to the virus, wolf populations have demonstrated resilience. However, there is no known cure in wild animals. Captive animals may be given supportive and symptomatic treatment such as antibiotics and intravenous fluids, but in many cases this is futile. Prevention through the use of vaccines approved for dogs may be effective in protecting wolves. Vaccination with a Modified Live Virus in a species other than the approved may result in reversion of the virus to virulent form and actually induce this disease (this has been seen in black-footed ferrets and lesser pandas).

Infectious Canine Hepatitis
Canine adenovirus-1 causes infection canine hepatitis, and transmission is usually through direct contact with contaminated respiratory tract discharge, saliva, urine, faeces or ectoparasites. In dogs, death can result in death within 12-24 hours of onset of clinical signs. This disease is enzootic in wolf populations. Supportive treatment with fluids and antibiotics may be helpful in some cases. There is a vaccine available that may provide lifelong immunity.

Other viruses observed in wolves include papillomatosis and canine coronavirus.

BACTERIAL DISEASES

Brucellosis
Brucellosis is a highly contagious, worldwide infection of both ungulates and carnivores. It is caused by Brucella bacteria – small, gram-negative, non-motile, non-spore-forming rods. Brucella suis type 4 infects wild caribou and domestic reindeer, and is of significance to wolves. Brucella abortus type 1 infects elk and bison in certain ranges of America and Canada. Wolves most likely become infected when they consume infected prey. A study has been done in wolves where pregnant females were infected with Brucella suis type 4 – no adults showed clinical signs but six of eight pups died shortly after birth, and the final two died 24 hours later.
I’m really not a fan of studies such as this where it is more than likely that participating animals will suffer adverse affects. In this study, the first pups to die had signs consistent with mother-induced trauma, but B. suis was cultured from different organs and blood from the pups, indicating while actual cause of death was trauma, the organism surely led to this outcome.
Organisms can infect the uterus and foetuses, and may lead to reproductive failure. They can be shed in the urine, saliva and milk.
Infected animals can be treated with certain antibiotics, but not all can be relied on to eliminate all infection.

Lyme disease
This disease infects humans and animals, and is caused by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Principal vertebrate reservoirs are thought to be the white-tailed deer and white-footed mouse. The organisms is primarily spread through the bite of infected deer and ticks, and these reservoir hosts do not show clinical signs of the disease. Transplacental transmission and contact are other possible routes of infection.
Clinical Lyme disease has not been reported in wolves, but the disease can be debilitating in dogs – causing fever, lymphadenopathy, arthralgia (joint pain) and arthritis. Abortion and faetal mortality have also been reported in infected humans and horses.
Lyme disease can also be treated with antibiotics.

Leptospirosis
Another worldwide diease. Leptospirosis is caused by Leptospira spirochetes. Leptospirosis may cause morbidity and sometimes mortality in numerous species. In dogs, leptospirosis can cause fever, anorexia, vomiting, anaemia, haematuria, jaundice and death is severe liver or kidney damage occurs.
Transmission is usually by contact with infected urine or by feeding on infected prey. It can be treated with antibiotics. There are vaccines approved for dogs that have been given to wolf pups and adults with no adverse reactions, but effectiveness of these bacterins in wolves has not been demonstrated.

Other bacterial diseases include tylaremia (an acute febrile disease or wild lagomorphs and rodents), bovine tuberculosis (which can remain viable in the soil for many years), salmonella and listeriosis.

FUNGAL DISEASES

Blastomycosis
A chronic pyogranulomatous pulmonary disease casued by the dimorphic gungus Blastomyces dermatitidis. Blastomyces is thought to reside in the soil, but experiments have not been able to maintain the fungus for extended periods in soil. Transmission probably occurs by inhalation of spores. Incubation times may be up to three months in dogs. The lung is the primary focus of infection, but the organism can disseminate to other organs. General clinical signs o infection include weight loss, fever, anorexia, weakness, skin lesions, depression, dyspnoea, lameness, ocular and nasal discharge, chronic coughing, draining lymph nodes, swollen joints, blindness and enlarged testicles. Although the illness can last up to three years, most animals survive less than four months.

Dermatomycosis
Also known as ringworm. The is a mycotic infection of the skin caused by Microsporum gypseum or other dermatophytes. It is not usually debilitating, but can cause intense inflammation of the skin, pruritis and hair loss. It can be transmitted from animals to humans, and is treatable.

 

For this and more information see:
Wolves
Behavior, Ecology and Conservation
Edited by L. David Mech and Luigi Boitani
2003

 

Sam.

America – Wolves: Nutrition

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Nutrition is an important part of any animal industry, and of course is an imperative discipline for our species. I have recently started a job for a pet food company here in New Zealand that has really encouraged me to go back to the technical nutrition papers I studied at University that I perhaps did not need to utilise as much with my zoo and vet nursing work. As I said, nutrition is an extremely important part of every organisation dealing with the care of animals, but specific energy requirement calculations and formula are seldom used by nurses or zoo keepers. Mathematics was never my strongest point, so I tend to get a little cross-eyed when working with scientific calculations – but I must say, I’m getting the hang of it again! Who knows, perhaps this post may be useful to someone.

Energy is of course required for survival. Not only this, an individual’s energy requirements vary depending on different factors. For example, energy for survival maintenance is needed for respiration, circulation, temperature regulation etc. but surplus energy is then required to properly sustain different life stages such as growth and reproduction. Not only do energy requirements vary, but nutritional requirements differ over time as well.

Wolf pups are weaned from their mother’s milk at 5-9 weeks of age, but may continue to nurse several weeks thereafter. In general, wolf milk is similar to that of the domestic dog but is high in protein and lower in fat. Naturally produced wolf milk contains more arginine than some commercial puppy milk replacers, so wolf pups raised by humans and fed a milk formula commonly develop cataracts without an arginine or lactose supplement (lactose assists in the absorption of arginine). Gelatine is a common arginine source that can be mixed with puppy milk replacer.

Prolactin from the pituitary gland is required for lactation maintenance (and may also play a role in pup development). Prolatin has a definite circannual rhythm (it works in repetitive yearly cycles) in both sexes, rising in spring with the onset of long days and decreasing during the short days of winter. Prolactin can induce or maintain parental behaviour in mammals. It may also be associated with coat shedding; as Prolactin increases in spring, wolves shed their thick, insulating undercoat. In autumn as day length and Prolactin levels decrease, the summer coat is replace by a thick winter pelage. Such associations Prolactin may have with reproduction and shedding, etc., will most likely be the outcome of complex reactions with other hormones.

There are three main growth periods for new pups (based on well-fed captive wolf pups):

1)      0-14 weeks – this period sees maximum growth rate; approximately 1.2kg per week for females and 1.5kg per week for males,

2)      15-27 weeks – rapid growth rate of approximately 0.6kg per week for both sexes,

3)      28-51 weeks – slow growth rate of roughly 0.03kg per week for females and 0.02kg per week for males.

Growth ends at about 12-14 months when the growing points of the radius and ulna (the two longest bones in the forelimbs) fuse together. Rates of physical development (such as tooth replacement) generally mirror those of weight gain. Adult dentition is in place at about 6-7 months of age.


BASAL METABOLIC RATE

The eventual full-grown size of a particular individual wolf depends on many different factors such as genetics and parasites. Underlying all factors is the wolf’s ability to transform its food into useable energy. If a wolf is unable to sufficiently absorb enough nutrients from food, its body then utilises its own tissues – i.e. the body literally consumes itself for the purpose of survival. This effect, of course, is far from ideal and can ultimately result in death.

Metabolism is the sum of all chemical changes occurring in tissue, consisting of anabolism (the synthesis of smaller, simpler molecules into the complex ones of living tissue) and catabolism (breakdown of complex molecules into simpler ones, usually resulting in a release of energy). The Joule is the standard unit of energy used in metabolic studies.
Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) represents the metabolism of an animal at rest in a thermally neutral environment. It is generally calculated with the following equation:
BMR(kcal/day) = Body Weight (kg)0.75.
Body size can affect BMR – for example, mice produce less total heat than elephants, however mice produce significantly more heat on a per-weight basis because they have a much higher BMR. Animals expend energy in proportion to their weight raised to the ¾ power – thus, they require energy on the same basis (i.e. smaller animals need more calories per kilogram of weight than large animals). If wolves had the Metabolic Rate and energy requirements of mice, they could not possibly catch enough to survive. Heart rates and body temperatures reflect also BMR. Small animals have higher heart rates and body temperatures than large animals. Wolf heart rates are similar to those of large dogs.

Feeding on protein increases BMR and heat production and elevates body temperature. In wolves, BMR increases after feeding to an average of 233.8J/hr and remains at that level for approximately 15 hours after feeding. Muscle tone contributes about 20% of total heat production; during strenuous exercise, oxygen consumption may increase twentyfold while energy expenditure may increase one-hundredfold. The different between these two measures represents an ‘oxygen debt’ which is ‘repaid’ by a continued elevated rate of oxygen consumption after exercise ends. When BMR is combines with maximum oxygen consumption, a metabolic index (volume of oxygen/BMR) can be calculated.

Wolf BMR averages 158.8 +/- 17.9J/hr. Adult males have a larger BMR than females, and pups. The energy consumption of running wolves is 5,070kJ/hr which, when combined with average wolf BMR (5,070/158) gives a metabolic index of 32 – this is about three times higher than the average for mammals as a whole. The high metabolic index in running wolves may reflect the wolf’s adaptation for high running speeds and endurance while chasing prey, and for saving energy when no prospective prey is available.

Temperature extremes also affect Basal Metabolic Rate. The average body temperature of the wolf is 39.6C. This they attempt to maintain through a combination of physical and chemical processes. Domestic dogs are unable to regulate their temperature at birth but are able to do so by four weeks of age – it is thought that wolves may be able to thermoregulate even earlier than this.

During times of falling or colder ambient temperatures, wolves maintain their body temperatures by curling up to reduce surfaces exposed to cold or by increasing insulation effectiveness of their fur through piloerection (the involuntary bristling of hairs). Peripheral blood vessels may constrict to reduce the thermal gradient between skin and the environment due to heat loss. Wolves have also evolved to utilise a process known as countercurrent exchange to reduce heat loss from limbs to the environment (which is significant). Within the limbs, deep arteries and veins run close together. Cooled blood returning from the limb surface picks up heat from the warm arterial blood. The arterial blood thus conserves heat by rewarming the venous blood before it returns to the body core. Arterial blood meanwhile loses less heat when it perfuses the skin. This process may be maladaptive for arctic animals exposed to extreme cold, however; when ambient temperatures are tissue-freezing, a countercurrent system might exclude so much heat from limbs that they might actually freeze. Again, wolves have evolved protective mechanisms to prevent this problem; they have unbranched arteries that carry blood directly through the footpad to a cutaneous vessel network in the pad surface. This plexus keeps foot temperature just above the tissue-freezing point (about -1C). Maximum energetic efficiency is achieved because the unit of heat exchange is located in the pad surface that contacts the cold substrate, rather than throughout the pad, where tissue damage could occur if the cooled blood fell below freezing.
External temperatures at which these heat-retaining mechanisms are insufficient to maintain a constant body temperature and at which heat production must be increased is known as the lower critical temperature. Below this temperature wolves can generate internal heat through exercise and shivering. During prolonged exposure to cold, however, the endocrine system increases metabolic heat production. Although this effect is primarily mediated by the thyroid hormones, others, such as growth hormone, insulin and adrenal hormones exert a regulatory effect.
When ambient temperatures rise, wolves may seek cooler environments (shade or a den, etc.) in which to cool down. If this strategy is unavailable or insufficient, cutaneous vasodilation (the dilation of blood vessels) increases and raises the skin temperature to foster convective heat loss to the environment. Heat is also dissipated by sweating – domestic dogs do this via glands in the footpads, but wolves actually have 80% fewer sweat glands in their pads. Panting coupled with increased salivation expels body heat through evaporative cooling.

Wolves in deserts have a higher Basal Metabolic Rate in summer than in winter. To dissipate excess metablolic heat and maintain a constant body temperature, these wolves must evaporate a substantial quantity of water. Fortunately desert wolves are extremely mobile, allowing them to find water that other species may not have such an ability to do. Wolves are, nonetheless, certainly better adapted to cold or temperate climates.

FIELD METABOLIC RATE

Basal Metabolic Rate reflects energy expenditure in a uniform state (e.g. sleeping), whereas Field Metabolic Rate is an estimate of total energy expenditure including basal metabolism, maintenance, thermoregulation and activity. After these essential energy requirements are met, extra energy may then be allocated to growth, fat deposition or reproduction. Thus, the daily food requirements of a mammal such as the wolf are determine by its Field Metabolic Rate.

According to Wolves: Behaviour, Ecology and Conservation (see end of post), a 37kg wolf has a Field Metabolic Rate of 17,700kJ per day. The average daily Basal Metabolic Rate is 3,811kJ per day (158.8 x 24 hours). The ratio of FMR to BMR is 4.6 (17,700 / 3,811). This FMR/BMR ratio is higher than for mammals as a whole.

We can also compare the FMR or wolves to that of other eutherians (placental mammals). The wolf’s FMR is about 26% higher than that of a typical eutherian of similar body mass, suggesting that wolves work harder than the average mammal to survive.

NUTRITION

When well fed, wolves store fat under the skin, around the heart, intestines, kidneys and in bone marrow. They tend to increase their fat stores during autumn and winter. Wolves kill prey sporadically, often going for days between feeds. During fasting periods, wolves must rely on catabolism – which results in weight loss. As fasting progresses, fat from all subcutaneous and internal deposits are used simultaneously, but subcutaneous fat is depleted first, then visceral fat, then kidney fat. Marrow fat is then rapidly metabolized. Foreleg bones are depleted before hind leg bones, and within those bones proximal fat stores are depleted before distal stores. If food is finally found after this period, wolves will gorge and eat up to 19% of their weight in a single feeding. This means wolves are able to make up for weight loss as long as nutritious prey is available.

Environmental temperatures affect the energy sources that wolves use. Mammals increase metabolic heat production when environmental temperatures fall below their lower critical temperature.  The principal type of fuel used under these conditions is fat. Animals in cold environments that mainly use fat for fuel should have more Free Fatty Acids (FFA) in their blood than more temperate-dwelling species, and this is indeed the case among wolves. Plasma Free Fatty Acid concentrations in arctic wolves that are fed fish and caribou are 203 times higher than those of temperate zone domestic mixed-breed dogs.

Wolves appear to be able to utilize saturated FFA at a higher rate than unsaturated FFA, causing a deficit of saturated fats in the plasma. This may be a life-saving strategy that has evolved in wolves. Saturated FFA in domestic dogs at low concentrations can cause sudden death by massive thrombosis (clotting of the blood). Unsaturated FFAs do not seem to form clots readily, so are better tolerated. Because saturated fat converts more rapidly to unsaturated fat in wolves than in dogs, unsaturated fats accumulate in the blood, while harmful saturated FFAs are rapidly removed and metabolised. Well-fed wolves will possess increased concentrations of FFAs, cholesterol and insulin – reflecting an increased intake of nutrients and the physiological responses needed to process them. Fasting wolves show a decrease in serum urea nitrogen and triiodothyronine in the blood. The nutritional status of wolves is also reflected in the urine.

For this and more information see:
Wolves
Behavior, Ecology and Conservation
Edited by L. David Mech and Luigi Boitani
2003

Sam.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 646 other followers